IHSAN KHAIRIR

A mirror site for my Blogspot. Go to my Blogspot site where I hang out more often.

Archive for the ‘ponderings’ Category

My Personal Issues with 1Malaysia Theme

leave a comment »

I have issues with the 1Malaysia theme: Rakyat Didahulukan, Pencapaian Diutamakan

Generally, the theme translates to ‘People First, Achievements Prioritized’

I’m keeping all my political inclinements aside (you should too) for the moment as I’m typing this.

I have issues with the theme. I don’t like it. In my opinion, it’s inappropriate, it sounds weird, and it gives the wrong messages.

Please put away the parangs and the torches and bear with me for a while.

I have said that the issues are entirely personal. And here they are:

1. As a theme for the National Day 2009, it’s just too long. It’s the predominantly the longest theme so far (compare the lengths here). Plus, 1Malaysia is not even a word.

2. National Day themes are usually meant to inspire the people to greatness (see past years themes here). Look at this year’s theme. Do you think it’s meant to inspire the people, or to reflect the aspirations of the government?

3. ‘Rakyat Didahulukan’ (‘People First’). When someone is put first, someone else is put behind. This part of the theme begs the question: who’s being sidelined here? The foreigners? Non-taxpayers? The Nine Rulers? The government? Government cronies? Like I said, wrong message here.

4. Also on this year’s ‘Rakyat Didahulukan’. It’s as if previously the rakyat (people) wasn’t first, this year we’ll start being first. So it some ways, it gives the message that the government has not been putting the rakyat first. Also it kind of in some ways acknowledge some people’s opinion on the government not putting the rakyat’s interests first. It gives the message that the government wants to change to a ‘people first’ government, and saying that this change is for the better acknowledges the existence of bad governance in the past. Again, wrong message here.

5. ‘Pencapaian Diutamakan’ (‘Achievements Prioritized’). This sounds like some milestones have been set and we must achieve and possibly go beyond those milestones. And achieving these milestones must be prioritized. Sounds so… corporate governance. This is not the rakyat’s aspiration. This sounds more for an organized body than the general public. An organized body like the Cabinet, the government departments, et cetera. Again, this is more about the government’s aspiration instead of the rakyat’s.

In general, my issue with the theme is that the theme is more suited for to promote the government’s aspirations and goals. The National Day is for the rakyat. Let us have a theme for us instead. After all, we the rakyat should be first, right?

What do you think about the theme for Malaysia’s 52nd National Day celebrations?

P/S: Some may judge me as narrow-minded, ignorant, leftist etc for posting this. I say let them judge. I know who I am, inside and outside.

Written by ihsankhairir

August 25, 2009 at 4:38 PM

Some Nobel Prize Winners and I

leave a comment »

If you go to the National Science Centre in Mont Kiara, you will find a colorful wall full of portraits of all the recepients of the various Nobel prizes over the years. Walking alongside the wall, we can’t help but notice a few Nobel winners that chose to stick out of the crowd and have quite nonconformist poses for their official Nobel portraits. Here are some of them…



Czeslaw Milosz (1911-2004), recepient of the Nobel Prize in Literature 1980, “who with uncompromising clear-sightedness voices man’s exposed condition in a world of severe conflicts”





Thomas Mann (1875-1955), recepient of the Nobel Prize in Literature 1929, “principally for his great novel, Buddenbrooks, which has won steadily increased recognition as one of the classic works of contemporary literature”




Eric R. Kandel (1929- ), one of the recepients of the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2000, “for their discoveries concerning signal transduction in the nervous system”




Gerard Debreu (1921-2004), recepient of the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 1983, “for having incorporated new analytical methods into economic theory and for his rigorous reformulation of the theory of general equilibrium”


Looking at all the portraits on the wall, I couldn’t help but notice that even more than significantly evident was the domination of European males or males of European descent in the list of recipients. Of course, sprinkled here and there, are some females, some Arabs and East Asians, and some of African descent. But the absolute supermajority of males of European descent in the Nobel Prize list makes me think:

1. Research done in other parts of the world needs better recognition than those done in the Western countries.

2. Significant hurdles in research (i.e. budget, equipment, facilities) need to be overcome in order to do more groundbreaking research. These hurdles might be more prominent in developing countries.

3. The brain drain, as in, the migration of great minds from third world or developing countries to developed countries such as the United States and/or the United Kingdom might have played a part in more scientific breakthroughs from the developed countries than the rest of the world.

4. The scientific community mostly consist of male scientists / researchers. For a significant period of time, females were either denied a scientic education/training (in favor of domestic training) or they were mostly not attracted to the field of science and scientific research.


Also, I could not help but wonder: Would I live to see the day when a Malaysian would rise and become a Nobel Laureate?

A Malaysian could only wish.

Written by ihsankhairir

July 8, 2009 at 7:28 PM

Posted in Photography, ponderings

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.